“Chris, I hate to say it, but you are full of shit! You wrote a great review of the new Sony a1 but skipped over anything that might be missing or any weaknesses - just like the Sony fanboy that you are. How much money has Sony thrown at you for a 5-star review? Shameful! I dare you to post this and include missing features and product weaknesses. Looking back through this blog, you used to be able to capture some of the best birds in flight shots in the world! Why did you need to bother upgrading from your beloved a9? Better yet: a full comparison to Canon and Nikon offerings” - James Laporte
James,
While I appreciate your thoughts, you sure do have a funny way of asking nicely! I dunno why, but I am accepting your dare!
First off, I didn't skip over the single most important weakness to me as a bird photographer. I clearly stated that in my limited time with limited opportunity, I had indeed experienced bird eye auto-focus failure when the camera kept locking onto the shoulder of a small dark bird.
Now that is out of the way, I can't think of anything else that I would like to see on the new a1, other than a top LCD. Not for me: I never used it when I shot with Canon or before that when I used Nikon. It is a great way to see what photographers in my workshops are doing, and a great tool to help direct my teaching toward them or alert them that there may be an exposure or shutter speed problem.
What I know others want: I know there is a high percentage of photographers who use built-in GPS to geotag their images, and I don't understand why Sony seems oblivious to this. Perhaps they are so determined to win over the press that they are blind to every other genre that drives their sales? If I were still a working photojournalist, I would want to have the image location embedded in the EXIF data for better image/event management.
While I prefer to review my images and change the menu through the electronic viewfinder, there is a significant number of Sony shooters who are screaming for a newer, higher-resolution, and fully articulated rear monitor. That's it.
Videographers complain that their favorite codec is not supported out of the camera.
That is honestly all that comes to mind.
As the image above demonstrates, the Sony a9 was an awesome camera. Why did I need to upgrade from my a9? Image file size, 30 FPS, better and faster auto-focus, and more dynamic range. Yes, the Sony a9 was the best in class at the time, but getting 30 images per second gives me an edge when it comes to the exact wing/head/eye/body position. The better dynamic range makes for a richer and truer image, while the bigger files allow more options for bigger images and cropping.
As for a real-world comparison with Canon and Nikon flagship camera bodies, although I have used both systems extensively, I don't own three systems to make that an option.
How much money did Sony throw at me for the review? The answer may surprise you: $0.00. I did get my hands on the first a1 in the country, and I am paid for my public appearances/presentations that Sony sponsors, but I got a great big fat nothing for the review. Many influencers raise funds with various degrees of begging campaigns to motivate you to place your order via affiliate links carefully placed throughout their reviews, but I choose not to do that (for now, at least).
So, full of shit? I guess the jury is out, but you can at least thank me for my honesty! The time I took to write and share my thoughts. That review yielded absolutely nothing towards my bottom line, it was a public service and an act of charity for those wanting to hear my thoughts about the newly announced/released camera :)
